View Full Version : US mid-term elections
Flexichick
8th November 2006, 07:13 PM
The Democrats took back the House, could possibly take back the Senate and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld resigned.
It's like Christmas in November!
A clear signal to the Bush White House that people are NOT happy with the Iraq war and the lies that surrounded it.
If it wasn't raining gatos y perros, I'd do a little dance in the street ;D
Flexichick
8th November 2006, 11:03 PM
I'm wondering how much coverage and what the sentiment is on this around the world.
Anyone?
ValenciaSon
8th November 2006, 11:09 PM
The senate remains split 50/50 by both parties but the republicans still have the advantage since ties can be shifted by the Vice President; a republican:'(
The house does not have enough democrats for a supermajority vote (> 66%). :'(
But at least the country is taking a turn towards a better direction, you gotta start somewhere:thumbs-up:
ValenciaSon
8th November 2006, 11:10 PM
Just out of curiosity, did our elections make it to the news radar at all in Europe?
guapo
8th November 2006, 11:14 PM
well it was the lead item on the BBC news tonight (does anybody still watch tv?) and I guess it will be on the front page of the newspapers tomorrow. So there is plenty of coverage here.
The question is what does it mean, will anything change or does it mean the US will be stuck with a lame-duck president for the next two years and is that a bad thing?
Alan
8th November 2006, 11:25 PM
American politics are very important in all of the world, because, well, you have the weapons...
All of this goes back to the same argument. It's great that Bush isn't as strong, but I think the Democrats are only marginally better. You have a two party system: you have to vote for the lesser of two evils. Clinton's administration still commited atrocities, but he did it with a smile on his face and he played the sax. What a guy! And you can't vote for a third party, for fear of "wasting your vote". I suppose it is wasting your vote.
In Scotland we have a form of proportional representation, which is better than first-past-the-post for many reasons. We have six main parties. You guys need that. It might help you control the power you have and aim it towards what the people want.
I have been enjoying reading about the swing towards the Democrats. My only fear is that it may not last long enough.
ValenciaSon
8th November 2006, 11:32 PM
If the democrats don't eff it up it can last a good while, even grabbing the triumvirate come 08.
While no one is innocent, the republicans certainly outpaced the democrats in terms of corruption, arrogance, deception and an isolationist mentality which just about ostracized us from the world.
Is there a difference between the two parties in terms of integrity and cooperation? You betcha! Otherwise, the democrats wouldn't have had their victory thanks to the swing voters and Rumsfeld would still be the secretary of defense.:smug:
guapo
8th November 2006, 11:35 PM
not so sure about that PR thing though, it is certainly no guarantee that there won't be abuses of power. See the link (http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,1941731,00.html) for the crazy sort of thing you can still get even with a government elected by PR.
gary
8th November 2006, 11:52 PM
Soon someone will film the last helicopter to leave Iraq and Tim Rice will write the lyrics to the hit musical Miss Bagdhad
Dubyas dad should have finished the job the first time round...
Flexichick
9th November 2006, 12:01 AM
Soon someone will film the last helicopter to leave Iraq and Tim Rice will write the lyrics to the hit musical Miss Bagdhad
Dubyas dad should have finished the job the first time round...
Well, you're not the only one who thinks that......to paraphrase the Dixie Chicks "I'm embarrassed that Bush is an American"
ValenciaSon
9th November 2006, 12:02 AM
Soon someone will film the last helicopter to leave Iraq and Tim Rice will write the lyrics to the hit musical Miss Bagdhad
Dubyas dad should have finished the job the first time round...
As long as it ain't Andrew Lloyd Weber writing the lyrics and turning it into a musical!:rolleyes:
guapo
9th November 2006, 12:05 AM
As long as it ain't Andrew Lloyd Weber writing the lyrics and turning it into a musical!:rolleyes:
talking of music (and I use the term loosely here) what about the other big story of the day - Britney filing for divorce :o
Alan
9th November 2006, 12:12 AM
Absolutely. Any voting system has its problems. With PR, an incredibly small party can swing the balance of power by deciding who to side with to form a coalition. This is the case in Scotland at the moment. Labour would form a minority government without the Liberal Democrats.
But, my point is that the voice of the people matters, and when a small proportion of the people change their minds, that is reflected immediately in terms of how many politicians from each party get elected. At the moment, it is very difficult for a third party to appear, because a vote for that party appears to be (and therefore is) wasted.
South Park sums it up pretty well with the episode entitled "Douche and Turd (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douche_and_Turd)".
ValenciaSon, I'm sure you're right that there's a difference. I particularly liked Al Gore's passion about the environment, which is something that is somewhat lacking from the current administration. Are they still as strong on those policies without Al Gore as heid bummer?
Voting for the other guys does not necessarily mean that they are the best people for the job either. I respect that you think they are and I'm not saying that I don't think they are. I'm playing my favourite game: devil's advocate. I don't know if this reached the US, but it was big news in Europe. In the French 2002 presidential election, Jacques Chirac (in France's version of the Republican party) was being challenged by Lionel Jospin (in their version of the Democratic party) and a third candidate: Jean-Marie Le Pen. The French were really pissed off by Chirac because of his right-wing policies; and the French do pissed off well. But they didn't want to vote for Jospin, because he was too much of a Liberal pansy. So, they voted for the third guy. A bit about Jean-Marie Le Pen: he founded the National Front party. This is a very far right, racist and facist party. The people of France did not want him in power. But they voted for him, to give Chirac a lesson. He actually won the first round, and it's lucky that there is more than one round because that was Chirac's only chance to win the electorate back (and he did). Yeah, it's a bit wordy, but it is possible for people to vote out of spite without really changing.
You see, you don't really have choice. You seem to have the choice of being aggressive or being aggressive. All in the pursuit of happiness, of course :) But the problem is (as Eddie Izzard says) that you pursue happiness :) and there isn't the choice not to, with a third party or PR.
But, as I say, I am delighted by these results. It shows, as far as is possible with your voting system, that the people are not happy with the Bush administration and it sends a great message out worldwide.
cubix
9th November 2006, 05:15 AM
Al Gore never showed his passion for the environment when running in 2000, and even when he was V.P. he did not accomplish much in ways of the environment. Also, the environment is not a good campaign issue, I was reading an article about this issue, they found that something like 95% of americans wanted to protect the environment, but they did not think of it as a significant campaign issue.
On Bush being a lame-duck President, I don't think he will become one. I think if anything he will work with Speak Pelosi, and also remember how small the margin is. Also, Liberman might swing more republican due to the fact that he ran as a independent and the Democrats will not give him the committees and chairships he wants.
It has also been proven that the government is divided(President is one party and the legislature is the other party) more is accomplished than when the same party controls both.
Also, with this election. One really has to look at the last 3 months or so for the Republicans. We have the foley, we have DeLay, Abramoff, etc.
I am glad Rumsfeld stepped down, it is time for a change. The only thing that concerns me, is that the Republicans were voted out mainly due to Iraq, but yet the Democrats also do not have a plan. What mudslining is going to occur in 2008.
ValenciaSon
9th November 2006, 12:56 PM
Well I just found out that James Webb is beating the Virginia incumbent senator George Allen. With this victory it gives the democrats ruling majority in the senate!:thumbs-up:
So we (dems) have the house and the senate! All that remains is the White House:smug:
If the democrats have a plan, you wouldn't of heard it since up until now, the republicans controlled the agenda on the floor of the house and the senate so you can't say the dems don't have a plan just because you haven't heard it.
gary
9th November 2006, 05:55 PM
Well I just found out that James Webb is beating the Virginia incumbent senator George Allen. With this victory it gives the democrats ruling majority in the senate!:thumbs-up:
So we (dems) have the house and the senate! All that remains is the White House:smug:
If the democrats have a plan, you wouldn't of heard it since up until now, the republicans controlled the agenda on the floor of the house and the senate so you can't say the dems don't have a plan just because you haven't heard it.
Hope they do better than New Labour did when they took over in the UK.... now they might even be arresting a serving prime minister for cash for honours...
richardksa
9th November 2006, 08:41 PM
now they might even be arresting a serving prime minister for cash for honours...
Oh please, please, please. Just to prove there is a God. But the others have to be locked up too.:rolleyes: What the heck - I'm moving to Spain.:cool:
gary
9th November 2006, 11:40 PM
Oh please, please, please. Just to prove there is a God. But the others have to be locked up too.:rolleyes: What the heck - I'm moving to Spain.:cool:
i'm with you on that one... What about Madrid in april.. can you get the time off pumping the black stuff?
britinbangkok
14th November 2006, 01:25 PM
Al Gore never showed his passion for the environment when running in 2000, and even when he was V.P. he did not accomplish much in ways of the environment. Also, the environment is not a good campaign issue, I was reading an article about this issue, they found that something like 95% of americans wanted to protect the environment, but they did not think of it as a significant campaign issue.
Cubix, actually that's not quite true. The family of one of my close friends in Texas is 'best friends' with the Gore's ie: they've travelled with them for years, had family events together etc. In the early 90s, my friend talked about Gore and his environmental campaigning. He's been obsessed with the environment ever since it became such a big issue in the 80s.
Crazy though, isn't it, that most Americans don't think the environment is a campaign issue? I've been out of the USA for almost 4 years now, and have absolutely no interest in ever living there again. It's stuff like that that just pisses me off about the US (not to mention their taking over the world, sticking their nose in other countries' business, their without question support of everything Israel does etc.). Lived there for 23 years and never loved the place.
But.....I am thrilled that the Dems have the majority. Don't think a lot will change, but it will put Bush in the position of lame duck President, which means he won't be able to pass extreme issues either (which unfortunately is what tends to often happen when a President is in a last term and doesn't have to worry about re-election).
ValenciaSon
14th November 2006, 02:26 PM
I would hope that no one lumps the US policy makers along with everyone else in the US because alot of us are frustrated at the current administration's position on the environment, and interfering with other governments while taking an isolationist's stance with the rest of the world, amongst other issues. Believe it or not, most of us americans do not want to conquer the world, nor use it as our junkyard.
I'm not saying you must return to the US or that you can't have your own opinion, but in a country as large and diverse as the US, there must've been some redeeming qualities you found.:confused:
gary
14th November 2006, 07:00 PM
If all the power was turned off in the uk and we stopped using any vehicles at all the carbon saving we make would be wiped out by Chinese expansion within 2 years. So what difference does it make and why do we have to pay almost £5 a gallon for fuel - a single average cow emits more greenhouse gas than my car. Every 40000 years the polar ice caps melt, then over the next 40000 they come back again - ITS GOING TO HAPPEN ANYWAY - best advice is dont buy riverside property or anything near the coast, sit back and enjoy the sunshine. As long as we dont get hit by an asteroid our ability to adapt and invent will see us through...
politicians love the environment because it distracts the voters from the real issues
britinbangkok
15th November 2006, 01:04 AM
I would hope that no one lumps the US policy makers along with everyone else in the US because alot of us are frustrated at the current administration's position on the environment, and interfering with other governments while taking an isolationist's stance with the rest of the world, amongst other issues. Believe it or not, most of us americans do not want to conquer the world, nor use it as our junkyard.
I'm not saying you must return to the US or that you can't have your own opinion, but in a country as large and diverse as the US, there must've been some redeeming qualities you found.:confused:
Hey - sure, there are some things I like about the US, but I once did a list and there were SO MANY things I disliked that I knew I would never go back to live there. I like American food, and I miss LA (lived there for 6 years before I moved to Thailand, and it's the only place I'd move back to in the US), I miss my friends and I like Americans, but, other than that, no, there's nothing else. Weird, huh? And once my parents move (they're thinking of retiring to Spain next year) then there wouldn't even be any incentive for me to visit the US. I am technically American (got citizenship a few years ago), but I don't feel any attachment to the country anymore really.
I knew the minute I came to Thailand that I loved it, and would always come back here, if I ever left. And I've always felt the same about Spain - the atmosphere is phenomenal there. The US, for me, is too sterile, too bland, too all-the-same - just really not that interesting :( . Plus, I hated that I got one week's vacation a year (most other countries get at least 6-8 weeks), I hated that for many Americans life is all about money and buying 'stuff', and I hated that my tax money was going to Iraq, weaponry, and an enormous military-industrial complex etc etc. I knew when I left 4 years ago, it was definitely time to go, and I've never once regretted it.
Gary, those comments are just silly.
Marina
15th November 2006, 11:45 AM
politicians love the environment because it distracts the voters from the real issues
I think at this point environment is one of the ISSUES!
ValenciaSon
15th November 2006, 12:05 PM
To use a British expression, I think Al Gore is "spot on" concerning the environment and his global warming film does pose quite a compelling argument to those who would view global warming as an unaltered part of the earth's heating-cooling cycle. There is quite a bit of evidence presented on how we humans are hastening the heating process with impact on the environment manifested in atypical natural disasters such as increasing hurricanes and tropical storms at increasing intensities. To ignore any of this is tantamount to sticking one's head in the sand because life is too inconvinient.http://smileys.smileycentral.com/cat/36/36_1_6.gif
gary
15th November 2006, 07:37 PM
To use a British expression, I think Al Gore is "spot on" concerning the environment and his global warming film does pose quite a compelling argument to those who would view global warming as an unaltered part of the earth's heating-cooling cycle. There is quite a bit of evidence presented on how we humans are hastening the heating process with impact on the environment manifested in atypical natural disasters such as increasing hurricanes and tropical storms at increasing intensities. To ignore any of this is tantamount to sticking one's head in the sand because life is too inconvinient.http://smileys.smileycentral.com/cat/36/36_1_6.gif
I agree, its happening anyway and we're doing nothing to help and might even speed it up by a few hundred years, but unles china and russia do something we are peeing into the wind, my point is that our government is rubbing its hands ant taxing the hell out of fuel to make our piddly little island use less fossil fuels and it is such a small percentage that it makes no difference--- it is a revenue raising affair to fill the black hole in our economy
Brian
16th November 2006, 12:26 PM
Voting for the other guys does not necessarily mean that they are the best people for the job either.
I agree wholeheartedly. Although I usually vote Republican, I am quite miffed at the current administration. Still, I don't know if many voters might cross party lines and vote the other way.
It's sort of like the current political situation in Spain, I suppose. Many Spaniards that I have talked to cannot believe that the Socialists are in power, and believe that they are only there because of negative reaction to 3/11.
Oh please, please, please. Just to prove there is a God. But the others have to be locked up too.:rolleyes: What the heck - I'm moving to Spain.:cool:
Lol, me too!
gary
16th November 2006, 06:46 PM
i agree with Alan... the only thing politicians are remotely interested in is being politicians... the issues are merely an inconvenient sideshow that gets in the way
Marina
16th November 2006, 06:49 PM
I agree, its happening anyway and we're doing nothing to help and might even speed it up by a few hundred years, but unles china and russia do something we are peeing into the wind, my point is that our government is rubbing its hands ant taxing the hell out of fuel to make our piddly little island use less fossil fuels and it is such a small percentage that it makes no difference--- it is a revenue raising affair to fill the black hole in our economy
While it would be ideal that the most populated countries started to take care of the environment, I think there is a lot that each person can do. Remember that is not only what you recycle, the energy that you save, the taps that you close while brushing your teeth... but also the example that you set to others, so this kind of thing becomes normal and then there would be no excuse for our politicians to avoid taking environment into account in their election programs.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.